Double Materiality and CSRD: A Dual Focus on Impact and Dependence

With the introduction of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) by the European Union, businesses with operations or commercial presence in the EU are set to undergo significant changes in their sustainability reporting practices.

One of the important concepts of the CSRD is double materiality. It includes i) Impact Materiality, how the company’s operations impact the environment and society and ii) Financial Materiality, how sustainability risks and opportunities affect the company’s financial performance.

Traditional materiality assessments often focused solely on financial impacts. However, double materiality gives importance to understanding and managing both the outward impacts on the environment and society and the inward financial implications of sustainability risks and opportunities. Here we discuss more about Double Materiality and CSRD.

Current Governance Code vs CSRD

The existing corporate governance frameworks often focus on financial materiality, and on how various risks and opportunities affect the company’s bottom line. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations, while increasingly important, are not always integrated.

On the other hand, the CSRD mandates a double materiality assessment, requiring companies to disclose both impact and financial materiality. This includes:

  • Identification of Material Impacts: Assessing the scale, scope, irremediability, and likelihood of impacts on the environment and society.
  • Financial Implications: Evaluating the size and likelihood of financial risks and opportunities stemming from sustainability issues.

The CSRD’s approach is more prescriptive, requiring detailed disclosures aligned with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS).

Impact of Double Materiality on Corporate Governance

While implementing double materiality presents challenges, such as the complexity of assessments and gathering comprehensive, accurate data, the potential benefits of increased transparency, sustainable practices, risk mitigation, and opportunity identification could outweigh these hurdles.

Corporate Transparency

Adopting a dual focus on impact and dependence increases corporate transparency. Companies are required to provide a more holistic view of their operations, which can build trust with stakeholders, including investors, customers, and regulators.

Driving Sustainable Practices

By recognising the dual dimensions of materiality, businesses are encouraged to adopt more sustainable practices. This can lead to improved resource efficiency, reduced environmental footprint, and better social outcomes.

Risk Management and Opportunity Identification

Double materiality helps in identifying and managing sustainability-related risks that could affect financial performance. Additionally, it highlights potential opportunities, such as innovation in sustainable products and services, which can drive long-term growth.

Reputation and Trust

Companies that effectively implement double materiality can enhance their reputation and build trust with stakeholders by demonstrating a commitment to sustainability.

Conclusion

The introduction of the CSRD and the emphasis on double materiality mark an evolution in corporate governance and sustainability reporting.

ZR Consultants believes that while the implementation of double materiality poses challenges, the potential benefits in terms of reputation, risk management, and regulatory compliance make it worthwhile. By adopting a dual focus on impact and dependence, businesses can improve transparency, drive sustainable practices, and identify strategic opportunities.

Our expertise in implementing, integrating, and reviewing risk and control frameworks can help businesses achieve excellence in governance and sustainability. Contact us today and follow us on LinkedIn to keep up to date.

Scroll to top